Flipping Feedback: Screencasting Feedback on Student Essays by Ron Martinez

By:      screencasting feedback

     January 8th, 2016

     Last semester I was faced with a larger-than-usual senior composition class for English majors—which of course also meant a larger-than-usual feedback load. With a new baby at home, I was more than a little concerned about finding the time to do it all. Fully aware of the research (e.g. Ferris, 1997; Hyland & Hyland, 2006) that favors more detailed feedback on student writing (seems “awkward: reword” just doesn’t cut it), I could not in good conscience consider reducing the quality or quantity of the feedback I usually give. Moreover, my feedback would typically include holding “writing conferences” (one-on-one consultations) with students—usually during office hours. But this was a big class, and there are just so many hours in a day.

I knew something had to give.

Having already tested the limits of the physical word, I turned to the virtual one. I had learned anecdotally of professors who sent audio podcasts of their feedback along with their written feedback, which seemed like a nifty idea. But, I thought, what if students could actually watch and hear me in a video as I go over their papers? If possible (which it is), that would approximate the kind of feedback experience I aimed to offer students without constraining it to a particular time or location.

Screencasting (recording and narrating actions performed by the instructor on a computer screen) did that and much more for me and my students. Below I describe the process and the resulting benefits.

Which software did I use?

After looking around a bit, I settled on using Screencast-O-Matic installed on my PC computer, but I know that Quicktime and other packages can work just as well.

What was the feedback process?

Students would submit their completed take-home writing assignments electronically. Especially for shorter assignments (e.g. fewer than three pages), I would only briefly skim over the text, and then launch Screencast-O-Matic to record my feedback in real time. In other words, students would see all highlighting, corrections, or suggested changes happen as I was making them on their Word documents. In effect, students would hear me “dialoguing” with them as I narrated what I was doing, why I was doing it, and what I was thinking throughout the feedback process. I would then return the marked-up document to students via email, along with a link to the (private) YouTube upload. To understand the written feedback, students would need to watch the video. For demonstration purposes, I created this short screencast of me providing feedback on a fictitious paper: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSZhNWCwSjA])

What did the students do with the feedback?

I recorded screencasts for all first drafts, and students were then required to submit a second draft. And that’s where the flipped part comes in. In most cases students would watch the screencasts before class, sometimes attempting a redraft at home, other times waiting to come to class to ask follow-up questions. On other occasions, particularly with feedback on longer essays, I was unable to get the screencasts back to students until just the night before class (Did I mention we have a new baby at home?), in which case the students would actually watch their videos at the outset of class on their various devices (kind of like having multiple versions of me talking to the students simultaneously about their papers), followed by in-class re-drafting.

What were some positive takeaways from the whole exercise?

Screencasting did more than simply allow me to maintain my usual feedback standards: in some respects, the virtual feedback was arguably better than my in-person (i.e. writing conference) feedback. For example, this particular class was comprised entirely of non-native speakers of English, thus potentially reducing the effectiveness of in-person conferences due to oral comprehension issues. By contrast, the screencast feedback could be played, paused, and re-played by students as often and as many times as they wished.

Another unexpected plus came from the “flipping”—particularly the in-class redrafting. What started as a kind of stop-gap measure because of late-night, last-minute feedback (i.e. students viewing the screencasts to start the class) eventually emerged as a dynamic activity that made class time more productive and student-centered. (And this was noticed by students too, as revealed in both mid-course and end-of-semester class surveys).

Anything negative?

It would be disingenuous to suggest that screencasting was a time-saver. It wasn’t. In some cases the screencasting took about as much time as I would normally expend giving just written feedback; on other occasions—longer papers in particular—the reading followed by oral commentary involved much more time than one would expect to spend if just writing in the margins of a student’s essay. But then “just writing in the margins” was never the point of giving screencasting a try in the first place.

References:
Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315-339.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues, 206-224.


Ron Martinez has taught language and language learning at a number of universities, including the University of Oxford and San Francisco State University. He is currently an assistant professor of English at the Federal University of Paraná in Curitiba, Brazil, where he also heads a research group focusing on the challenges faced by Brazilian scientists who need to publish their work in English.


Posted with the kind permission of Ron Martinez.

http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-with-technology-articles/flipping-feedback-screencasting-feedback-on-student-essays/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork

Advertisements

our blog is here to share our ideas, thoughts and suggestions with both teachers and learners about language learning. we are an elite group of education professionals from around the world sharing our knowledge with others from around the world.

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in e-learning, english, language, students, Uncategorized, writing
One comment on “Flipping Feedback: Screencasting Feedback on Student Essays by Ron Martinez
  1. Amine Ghob says:

    I couldn’t just pass by without saying a word. Thank You for being generous enough to share with us what you did and for how creatively you managed to leverage technology in finding a very interesting way to teach and provide personalized feedback for your students.
    Regards.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

recent posts: online language center blog

SAILING THE SEA OF CTRL C + V by Rob Howard

SAILING THE SEA OF CTRL C + V     by Rob Howard

By now, I’m sure we’ve all seen the Melania Trump speech that plagiarized Michelle Obama. Finally, teachers the world over have the perfect example to demonstrate blatant plagiarism to their students.

EFLtalks answers – 10 in 10 for YOU

EFLtalks answers – 10 in 10 for YOU

Got questions? We’ve got answers. 10 in 10 for YOU

Flipping Feedback: Screencasting Feedback on Student Essays by Ron Martinez

Flipping Feedback: Screencasting Feedback on Student Essays by Ron Martinez

Looking for a new way to mentor students of academic writing, Ron Martinez came up with a great one. This should be the new standard.

Recipes for the Unteachable by David Petrie

Recipes for the Unteachable by David Petrie

Are there controversial topics that you want to teach, but you do not know how? Do you think your students might not be ready for them? David Petrie has the perfect recipe for these issues. You can read some ideas in his blog post and also for more tips, do not miss his webinar for BELTA on January 10th, at 16.00 CET!

Introducing our free new ebook – Parsnips in ELT: Stepping out of the comfort zone (Vol. 2)

Introducing our free new ebook – Parsnips in ELT: Stepping out of the comfort zone (Vol. 2)

Introducing our free new ebook – Parsnips in ELT: Stepping out of the comfort zone (Vol. 2)

LOOK WHO’S EFLTALKING by Rob Howard

LOOK WHO’S EFLTALKING by Rob Howard

This article originally appeared in the BRAZ-TESOL newsletter, volume 04.2015.

The Good, The Bad, And The Online by Rob Howard

The Good, The Bad, And The Online by Rob Howard

How do you deal with people who want your services for free? Take a look at this.

Should I mind my own Beeswax? by Rob Howard

Should I mind my own Beeswax? by Rob Howard

Reposted from EFL Magazine, my article about whether or not we should be spending time teaching outdated idioms with some many others that we miss.

EFLtalks – talks for teachers
Follow online language center blog on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,076 other followers

Blog Stats
  • 70,382 hits
%d bloggers like this: